-
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang thinks there will be a ChatGPT moment for physical AI.
-
Nvidia developed Isaac and GR00T foundation models as platforms for robotics applications.
-
A recent study identified one single habit that doubled Americans’ retirement savings and moved retirement from dream, to reality. Read more here.
Whether or not 2026 really is the big year of physical AI (I think it’s likelier to be the year when agentic AI breaks out) and robotics, much hype surrounds recent comments made by the great Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang, who believes his firm has achieved a “ChatGPT moment” with regards to physical AI. And investors have every bit of reason to believe in the magnitude of the breakthrough innovation going on behind the scenes of the world’s largest company.
In the meantime, investors should prepare for the exciting things to come as firms, especially those within the Mag Seven, look give AI their all. If you’re living in a city where self-driving robotaxis are already on the roads, you’ve already gotten a glimpse of the tremendous promise that physical AI has to offer.
Robotaxis is the form of physical AI in motion that many are probably most familiar with. Over time, though, investors should be ready for the power of physical AI to go beyond the roads. Whether we’re talking about humanoid robotics, like those featured at this year’s CES 2026, or the Optimus robots, which Elon Musk is readying for a hopeful launch at some point next year, it certainly feels like robotics is where the puck is going next in the fast-moving world of AI.
In the meantime, though, there are AI agents that could continue to cause massive waves across the tech industry. As more investors discover the mindblowing potential of agentic AI, perhaps there’s more pain to come for the traditional software stocks, including the ones that are doing a good job of embracing agents.
At the end of the day, agentic AI is going to shuffle the cards, and the SaaS firms that used to hold a great hand might not be all too delighted with the cards they’re dealt in the age of agents. And, of course, there’s that fear that being too good at agents could be a net negative, as higher productivity and fewer heads means fewer seats to sell. While there’s still much to be made about agents, I still think it’s worth thinking about what comes next.
Physical AI could have the potential to change the world, just as agents seem to be doing right now. And while it may feel a bit early for some investors, I do think that the mega-cap tech titans are readying for what could very well be another “ChatGPT” (or should I say Gemini 3.0, Claude Code, or OpenClaw) moment.
